Lenin's speech:What Is Soviet Power? / Ленин:Что такое Советская власть?
Dodał: LiebknechtTB
Opis filmu:
☭ Ленин: Что такое Советская власть? Lenin's speech:What Is Soviet Power? Lenin hitzaldia: Zer da sobietar boterea? ******************************************** http://www.spartacist.org/ ******************************************** Darkmatter1985-ri kopiatua *********
********************************** "What is Soviet power? What is the essence of this new power, which people in most countries still will not, or cannot, understand? The nature of this power, which is attracting larger and larger numbers of workers in every country, is the following: in the past th
e country was, in one way or another, governed by the rich, or by the capitalists, but now, for the first time, the country is being governed by the classes, and moreover, by the masses of those classes, which capitalism formerly oppressed. Even in the most democratic and freest republics, as long a
s capital rules and the land remains private property, the government will always be in the hands of a small minority, nine-tenths of which consist of capitalists, or rich men. In this country, in Russia, for the first time in the world history, the government of the country is so organised that on
ly the workers and the working peasants, to the exclusion of the exploiters, constitute those mass organisations known as Soviets, and these Soviets wield all state power. That is why, in spite of the slander that the representatives of the bourgeoisie in all countries spread about Russia, the word
"Soviet" has now become not only intelligible but popular all over the world, has become the favourite word of the workers, and of all working people. And that is why, notwithstanding all the persecution to which the adherents of communism in the different countries are subjected, Soviet power must
necessarily, inevitably, and in the not distant future, triumph all over the world. We know very well that there are still many defects in the organisation of Soviet power in this country. Soviet power is not a miracle-working talisman. It does not, overnight, heal all the evils of the past- illite
racy, lack of culture, the consequences of a barbarous war, the aftermath of predatory capitalism. But it does pave the way to socialism. It gives those who were formerly oppressed the chance to straighten their backs and to an ever-increasing degree to take the whole government of the country, the
whole administration of the economy, the whole management of production, into their own hands. Soviet power is the road to socialism that was discovered by the masses of the working people, and that is why it is the true road, that is why it is invincible." V.I. LENIN
Tagi: lenin revolutionary documentary america argentina ☭ Left socialism strike australia canada usa california chicago politic denver texas mexico new orleans paris roma ankara beijing tokyo chile cuba gusanos miami quebec ireland dublin valencia barcelona girona
Kategoria: Tech
Powiązane filmy:
Komentarze: Pokaż || Ukryj














STAND NO CHANCE AGAINST THIS SOVIET
It does not, overnight, heal all evils of the past- illiteracy, lack of culture, the consequences of a barbarous war, and the aftermath of predatory capitalism. But it does pave the way to socialism. It gives those who were formerly opressed the chance to straighen their backs to an ever-increas
ing degree to take the whole government of th[...]
communism.....
first you can't remove Christianity and faith from the hearts of the poeple, and secondly multiculturalism does not work, there cant be many different cultures and races under one banner, it must be one people, one language, one culture one nation with a single drive to maintain and build not fo
r the private intrest but for this na
In a small community this may work, but not on a national scale. Such is human nature.
incentives of course
Say we have a student entering the communist society for the first time. Imagine on one hand, we have a medical occupation that requires ten years of training, hard work, before you can take the job. On the other hand, there's the job of being a simple farmer, who earns the same income as a doctor
without the study effort necessary. Why work as a doctor if you'll make the same amount as a farmer, minus the time effort for extended schooling?
man wants to work, unfortunatly he must compete with the son of the rich man who never worked a day in his life but had all the advantages money can buy. The rich lazy son WILL use his money to keep the worker son down. Also human nature. There s no perfect system. Sad.
scope of political perspective, either entirely (and in some cases, blindly) completely obedient to either Capitalism or Communism. No fascism ;). You up for one?
get into a derrogatory swear fest... But I would love to see what you have to say on this matter and maybe we can actually have an intelligent exchange of ideas on YouTube for once!
speakers. Hittler first, lenin second, stalin third.
- is frickin moron. Go to GULAG, bydlo.
- labors!
into it :D With regards to your previous comment, I felt that you could also relate that example to Communism as well, as the lazy worker is rewarded for lazy behaviour, whilst the hard worker would feel no need to strive harder because he's only getting paid as much as the person who barely wo
rks. To that extent, any concessions or benefits bestowed on the hard-working farmer would be a break from the ideal Marxist model.
be Lenin's NEP, or "New Economic Policy" in 1921 in response to the complete failure of "War Communism", which (certainly to me) appeared to be the most close knit example of pure Marxist Communism ever to implemented on a society. Really, any break from this model is in any variation a break
from the fundamental theory of Communism, so at a base level the bedrock of the idealogy, political and social structure of the Communist system is flawed from this.
complex topic that may be made better by ulterior involvement :D
are inevitably going to become corrupt and want to keep that power. power will corrupt nearly any human being and make them crave more.
there have to be some serious checks and balances or I guess you can get the government to fear the people.
in modern society is meant to give rights to the common working man, where fascism and capitalism brutally strip these rights away. That's why it was so appealing back then and not now, because now most societies have a mixture of socialist and capitalist thinking.
accent? Or maybe that was not an accent at that time? I hear an accent. Not that it matters.